I’ve spent years studying why manufacturing plants lose production time.
The data keeps pointing to the same place.
It’s not the machine.
It’s the method. It’s the man. It’s the missing procedure at 2am when your most experienced technician is on leave and someone who’s been on the floor for 6 months is staring at a failing asset with no guidance.
My PhD research confirmed what plant managers already feel in their gut — the majority of production downtime traces to man and method, not machine failure.
The machine gets blamed.
The real problem never gets fixed.
And the same failure happens again next month.
This is why I built SquareMethods.
And why I designed a reliability curriculum that addresses the problem at every level — from foundational equipment knowledge to optimized PM strategies, root cause analysis, and maintenance planning.
Over the next few weeks I’ll be walking through each layer.
Because if your plant is still reactive, it’s not because your team isn’t trying.
It’s because the system isn’t set up to help them succeed.
That changes.
@SquareMethods

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Explore More

The workshop builds the strategy. SquareMethods makes it stick.

Your PM program is probably not optimized.That’s not an insult. It’s a structural reality.Most PM programs were built by copying OEM recommendations, inheriting tasks from a previous planner, or reacting

Procedures for machines should live on the machine.

Procedure

Every procedure your team builds should live at the machine — not in a folder. Every reliability engagement produces documents.Optimized PM procedures. RCA findings. Equipment working principle guides. Planning templates.

Fixing it, First Time Right.

fix

If you’re fixing the same failure twice, you never fixed it the first time. There’s a failure mode more expensive than any breakdown. It’s the breakdown that keeps coming back.